Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Citizenship

On this 50th anniversary of the March for Jobs and Freedom, I'm thinking about the rights and responsibilities of citizenhood.  I have many friends who are disengaged from politics and policy, either because it's too frustrating or because they think voting doesn't change anything.  I get that. I really do.  Sometimes I feel the same way myself.  But ultimately I think this is a myopic view of one's place in the world.

For those who don't think your vote matters, consider where we've come from. Consider how enfranchisement has made a difference to African Americans since the March.  Consider the ways in which the vote has changed the world for women since we gained the right to vote in this country not even 100 years ago.  And consider how badly some politicians want to curtail voting by making it more difficult to prove residency and register.  Yes, your vote matters, even though you may be frustrated with politicians in the two major parties because so much of what they say sounds the same, and because they are constantly in the thrall of those with the most money.  Your vote matters, because it's the little things that differentiate them that will become big changes in the world.  In a republic such as ours, it's the judges and justices our leaders choose, the policies they implement via government agencies, the economic priorities they make, that demonstrate that yes, it does matter whom we put in office.  And it matters even more in the United States at the state and local levels. 

And if you do vote, consider that the gains made since the March for Jobs and Freedom were not won by a vote alone, nor were they made by politicians in a vacuum.  They were made by people who risked their reputations, their freedoms, and their lives knowing the future might not arrive in their lifetimes.  Nor are these gains irreversible.  Voting is not enough.  Be aware of the world.  Listen to different points of view.  Consider the motivations of the actors.  Learn history and understand how your governments work.  And when you see a wrong, call it out, whether by communicating through the press, through social media, through collective action, or directly with your leaders.  Citizenship is your right, but it's also your responsibility.

Never forget this:  "A small group of thoughtful people could change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead.  I sincerely hope I will be one of those thoughtful people.

Friday, December 14, 2012

Christmas Music for Jews



No matter how much most secular pop Christmas music gets on my nerves (and it really gets on my nerves), I still appreciate traditional religious Christmas music and classical Christmas-inspired pieces.  That might seem odd, since I’m a convert to Judaism, but the traditional Christmas music touches the part of my brain that likes to think about spiritual matters, even though I don’t come to the same religious conclusions Christians do.

Consider the beloved choral piece “For Unto Us A Child is Born,” as translated for Handel’s Messiah.

 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.”

The lyrics are the King James English translation of Isaiah 9:6, as sacred to Jews as to Christians.  But the lyrics have a different significance to people of each faith.  To Christians, they are confirmation of the fulfillment of prophesy through Jesus.  To Jews, they are a promise that has not yet been fulfilled.  And the text is absolutely legitimate when imagined through either world view.
 
From my Jewish point of view, the idea that “the government shall be upon his shoulder” is a pretty clear indication that the literal and supposedly historical figure of Jesus could not be the promised Messiah.  But Christians have other ways of interpreting this phrase.  And in a way, it doesn’t really matter, because whether you see the Messiah as having arrived in a literal sense, or whether you see the Messiah as a metaphor for a new birth of spirituality and human kindness that is yet to take place, as I do, joy and hope are the end result.

Joy, hope, and peace are the hallmarks of traditional Christmas music.  The quiet beauty of “Silent Night,” the jubilance of “Joy to the World,” and the stately reverence of The Messiah are universal in nature, though not in the specific religious interpretations of their texts.  Rather, the large body of traditional Christmas music that has survived the decades and even the centuries has survived because it speaks to a broader spiritual yearning that the major religions all have in common. So, though I am Jewish, I still listen.

Friday, November 16, 2012

Peace and Patience

In the wake of the recent escalation in Israel and Gaza, a friend posted this reasonable query to me: "What do I do with friends from Israel who are making 5-10 [Facebook] posts everyday to 'educate' us on how all the bombing is all really OK and justified?"  I get it. It's maddening to see your friends become defensive about Israel when you otherwise believe them to be partners for peace.  Here is the response I gave her, slightly paraphrased:

Maybe gently remind them there are Palestinian civilians in pain too, and then move on. Block them temporarily if it bothers you a lot. Don't let them polarize you by simplifying a complex problem.

Both sides have terrible, childish leadership right now, and the people on both sides are reflecting that. But there's a lot of frustration and pain on both sides as well, and your friends from Israel are probably frustrated and afraid. For instance, we have a good friend who's been sleeping in a bunker for the past two nights, and it isn't her fault the Israeli and Palestinian leaders are lobbing rockets at each other. Many of your other Israeli and Jewish friends are seeing things from the not-always balanced point of view that results from having friends and family in harm's way.

Friday, June 1, 2012

A Response to Pseudo-Religious Self Protectionism

Lately I'm seeing a trend in self-help books and internet sites that promote the idea that one should alleviate one's own "suffering" in order to be one's best self.  Surely that concept itself is not revolutionary, and I fully support the idea that one must take care of one's self before one can take care of others or be a force for good in the world.

However....

I am seeing this trend more and more as an excuse to divorce one's self from the ills of the world.  I recently read an article that basically suggested that shit happens, it's supposed to happen, and it's not one's job to worry about it.  Apparently, under this theory, one's only responsibility is to one's self-protection.  I find this absolutely appalling.  Worse, I often find it stated in the context of self-centered, self-help-minded pseudo-religion.

I was raised on the heels of the civil rights movement, from a place where people of all and no faiths came together to insist that Americans of color be treated equally and have the same rights as white Americans. Civil rights leaders and their followers risked their lives (and their lives were sometimes taken) in order for this equality of opportunity be afforded.  Yes, this did cause them pain. Change sometimes requires suffering. I don't believe it needs to require the same level of suffering for everyone or for every injustice, but I do believe in upholding the ideal that sometimes one must sacrifice a little of one's own happiness, comfort, and security to achieve justice for all.

Anyone who knows the stories of Buddha, or Jesus, or the Hebrew Exodus is aware that self-actualization or group change that has any meaning is preceded by a period of suffering.  Suffering is part of the process of being a better person and of creating a better world.  That doesn't mean accepting someone else's suffering, or even accepting one's own suffering permanently - but it does mean that conflict and pain often precedes meaningful change.

There is a time for letting go. Of this I have no doubt. There is a time when one must recognize that one is suffering for no good reason, and when one must cease that suffering in order to move on.  But I also have no doubt that there is a time for struggle. I worry about a culture where we seriously seem to want to tell people that alleviating our own personal suffering - at the possible expense of helping others alleviate theirs - is a legitimate path to personal salvation. I don't want to live in a world where people are so selfish and isolated, and I certainly don't want to be that kind of person.

Monday, May 21, 2012

Friedman is Not Sponsored by Anyone

I don't always agree with Thomas Friedman. For a guy who's supposed to be knowledgeable about the world, he often seems out of touch with life in the US.  He displays this naivete in the following New York Times column, but the important thing is that he finally gets it. Marketing Is Us. And we're taking it to an extreme that is destroying our civic identity:  This Column is Not Sponsored by Anyone - New York Times, May 12, 2012